WELCOME TO POSTAL-iNDY.COM:

When viewing single articles[post] or articles by subject you can always return to the main[most current] page
by clicking the postal-indy.org banner at the top of the page.
Articles/Post appear in reverse order, newest Post at the top, older Post move down until they 'fall off'.
You can always find them on the pages listed in the Table Of Contents.
*Some articles may appear on more than one page, depending on their relevance.

6/28/10

Executive Pay Watch:

“A chief executive officer of a Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 index company was paid, on average, $9.25 million in total compensation in 2009.[1] At the same time, millions of workers lost their jobs, their homes and their retirement savings in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Executive pay has taken center stage since the $700 billion government bailout of financial institutions. Americans expressed outrage as big banks helped create the financial crisis, took billions in taxpayer bailouts, paid out billions in pay and bonuses and are now lobbying on financial regulatory reform.

The case studies here focus on executive pay at six of the biggest banks that received government bailout funds and their multimillion-dollar lobbying efforts. Also in Executive PayWatch, you can find CEO compensation data for some of the country’s largest companies; learn how you, as a shareholder, can have your "Say-on-Pay"; and find out what you can do to ensure re-regulation of the financial system.”

image

visit Executive PayWatch

YTD Postal Service’s OSHA Fines Over $2 million:

USPS Cited for Violations in Portland, OR
APWU Web News Article 061-2010, June 28, 2010
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited the USPS for “willful and serious” safety violations at the Portland, OR Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC) for exposing employees to electrical hazards.
The OSHA citations issued at the Portland facility total $77,000. Postal employees were performing tests on live equipment without adequate protective gear, and were exposed to electrocution from energized machinery. Two additional fines were issued for failure to lockout power sources on machinery and for inadequate insulation on power cables at the P&DC.
The recent citations bring the Postal Service’s total OSHA fines to over $2 million.

6/24/10

Burrus Testimony: USPS Can and Must Expand the Services It Offers

Capitol Hill Testimony
Burrus: USPS Can and Must
Expand the Services It Offers

APWU Web News Article 059-2010, June 23, 2010

Predicting that mail volume will grow in 2012, APWU President William Burrus told lawmakers June 23 that slashing service will not solve the Postal Service’s current financial difficulties. The APWU “believes the USPS can and must expand the services it offers,” he said.

“No service-oriented business can grow by reducing service,” Burrus told the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security, and the House Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, Postal Service, and the District of Columbia.

Burrus testified [PDF] on behalf of the APWU at the joint congressional hearing to examine the difficulties currently facing... see more

6/23/10

Exposing The UPC Barcode Myth:

Recently an article has surfaced in several locations stating that you can tell where an item was manufactured by examining the consumer UPC barcode on the package. This article is almost verbatim from a ‘spam’ email that has been circulated for some time now.
The ‘gist’ of the article/email is that by examining the barcode you can use the information to avoid purchasing items ‘Made In China’.
The problem with the article is the misplacing of the emphasis on China and the fact that it is not true.
First, the misplaced emphasis: While I will agree that China is the worst offender and dominate entity in terms of the importation of goods and materials formally manufactured in the US they do not stand alone in the negative impact of outsourcing American manufacturing jobs. I wouldn’t even award them first place in the rush to move good paying manufacturing jobs out of the US. First place would go to Wal-Mart with China in second place or no better than a tie with Wal-Mart. 
The emphasis should not be on don’t buy Chinese but rather it should be first and foremost on ‘Buy American’!
A big part of our immigration problem is a direct result of the outsourcing of American jobs outside of our borders. So while China has a big chunk of the manufactured products that we import many countries with a smaller percentage of those products are contributing to our immigration problem because of their role in exploiting their own workforce to the extent that they seek sub-par wages in America because of insufficient wages and protection in their own country. First and foremost “BUY AMERICAN” and if you can’t then look for the lesser of two evils.
Second, the barcodes do not identify where products are manufactured. At one time this may have been true, or may have been an intent at some point, but it is not the case anymore. The urban myth/fact or fiction website Snopes exposes the myth as containing a mixture of true and false information. The TruthOrFiction website labels it as FALSE.
To verify these assertions I googled and visited several sites on the topic and found out several facts from those sites:
  • GS1 Barcode: GS1 Prefixes do not provide identification of country of origin for a given product. They simply provide number capacity to different countries for assignment from that location to companies who apply. Those companies in turn may manufacture products anywhere in the world.”
  • Simply Barcodes: “…Yes, we can supply barcodes to companies located outside of the USA. Our barcodes are valid worldwide.”
  • Barcode 1: “…Remember, it indicates the country that issued the code, NOT THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OF THE PRODUCT. …The meaning of the prefixes ""020-029", "040-049" and "200-299" are set by the GS1 administration in a given country. GS1-US has defined these prefixes as for internal use in, for example, warehouses. The authoritative list is here.”
    also at Barcode 1:   ”Does the barcode number indicate the country of origin of a product?   No it doesn't. The 3-digit prefix code indicates which GS1 numbering organization has allocated the block of numbers to the company. Once the company has been assigned the block of numbers, they self assign each individual number in the block to a given product. For example, a company may have it's headquarters in South Africa. The GS1 organization in South Africa has the code "600", but all the products of the company may be manufactured in England. The English-made products would still have the "600" prefix code. The prefix code is a way to have 70-plus GS1 member organizations issuing numbers without having to worry about duplicate numbers. The 3-digit prefix indicates the country of the GS1 organization that issued the block of numbers, not the country of origin of the product. GS1 (the international organization that administers UPC and EAN) has a
    clear statement that the prefix DOES NOT indicate the country of origin of the product. A list of country codes can be found on the UPC & EAN Page.”
  • Wikipedia: EAN-13 barcodes also indicate the country in which the company that sells the product is based (which may or may not be the same as the country in which the good is manufactured). The leading digits of the code determine this, according to this code list. The EAN-13 encoding rules encode the leading 13th digit by modifying the encoding of the left-hand half of the barcode: the original rules for UPC are treated as a '0' if read as EAN-13. A UPC barcode XXXXXXXXXXXX therefore is the EAN-13 barcode 0XXXXXXXXXXXX.”
As you can see from these sites not only do the codes not represent the country of origin but because codes can be recycled and sold they can be used to disguise the country of origin. So ignore the codes and until we can get more accurate identification research your purchases and look for the Made In America labels. On this website and my other websites I have a “Buy American Resources” tab [at the top] or link that you can bookmark/favorite and reference.
Glenn Littrell

6/20/10

Follow the APWU on Facebook and Twitter!

APWU Web News Article 049-2010, June 3, 2010

Members can now keep up with the latest union news and information by following the APWU on Facebook and Twitter.

To join the many APWU members, officers, and supporters who are already “fans” of the union, members with Facebook accounts can search for “APWU,” or may access the page directly by typing in www.facebook.com/APWUnational. APWU fans will be able to view news articles linked from the union’s Web site.

Members can also follow the APWU on Twitter. By following the union at www.twitter.com/apwunational, you can receive “tweets” about the latest APWU news. Followers will receive notification online or via text message when the union has posted news articles.

The union also recently added a ShareThis! feature to the Web site, which allows members to add a direct link to newsworthy stories to their Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking accounts.

6/9/10

Fight to Save Saturday Service Approaches Important Milestone:

from APWU Web Site:
APWU Web News Article 050-2010, June 3, 2010
Postal employees and customers are approaching an important milestone in the fight to save Saturday service, as a House resolution supporting six-day mail delivery continues to gain momentum.
Close to 200 U.S. Representatives have signed on to co-sponsor House Resolution 173, which says “the U.S. Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its six-day mail delivery service.” A total of 218 votes are needed to adopt the “sense of the

6/6/10

USPS OIG: Federal Express – Transportation Agreement – Northeast Areas

From Postal Reporter News: May 26, 2010 by Lu

This report presents the results of our self-initiated audit of the Federal Express (FedEx) transportation agreement. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether selected transportation operations were effective and economical (Project Number 09XG027NL000). See Appendix A for additional information about this audit.
On August 2, 2006, the U.S. Postal Service signed a new 7-year agreement with FedEx. FedEx transports time sensitive mail for the Postal Service, including Express Mail®, Priority Mail®, and First-Class Mail® (FCM). FedEx transportation is usually more expensive than commercial air carrier or surface transportation,

Tribute To APWU Members & Family Killed In Action:

The Very Real Threat Of Postal Privatization:

The series:
  1. The Very Real Threat Of Postal Privatization
  2. The History of Postal Privatization [And How It Works]
  3. What a Privatized Postal Service Would Look Like [forthcoming]
  4. The ‘Perfect Storm’ That Threatens Us [forthcoming]